| ||||||||
|
|
Conscription, Faith, and YouthBy Titus Peachey, Mennonite Central Committee U.S.February 2003
Will there be a draft?Whenever the United States threatens or begins military action, this question usually arises. Since the end of the war in Vietnam, the U.S. has conducted military operations in many countries, including Grenada, Haiti, Panama, Iraq, Kuwait, Sudan, Afghanistan, Somalia, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Colombia, and Yugoslavia/Kosovo, without a return to the draft. Thus it is doubtful that a war on terrorism would result in a military draft, unless it becomes an extended conflict, or involves multiple battlefields.
In the months following the terrorist attacks of 2001, Selective Service has placed continual updates about the potential for a draft on its website (www.sss.gov). These updates, including quotes from various government leaders have always stated that a draft is not likely.
The Center on Conscience & War in Washington D.C. issued an action alert in August, 2002, warning that an invasion of Iraq may result in a return to the draft as U.S. military forces are stretched thin due to commitments in many spots around the globe. CCW notes, however, that one of the best ways to avoid a return to the draft is to prevent a war with Iraq or any other nation. Congress has also joined the discussion about a potential draft. In December of 2001, The Universal Military Training and Service Act of 2001, H.R. 3598 was introduced in the US House of Representatives. This legislation establishes mandatory military service for men age 18-22. Conscientious objectors would be required to participate in basic military training before entering alternative service. This bill was referred to the subcommittee on military personnel on January 28, 2002. Thus far no action has been taken. On March 20, 2002, Representative Ron Paul of Texas introduced a "sense of Congress" resolution (H. Con. 368) declaring that reinstatement of the military draft or implementing any other form of compulsory military service...would be detrimental to the long-term military interests of the United States. This resolution was also referred to the subcommittee on military personnel, without further action. Representative Charles Rangel of New York, a strong opponent of war with Iraq, introduced HR 163 on January 7, 2003. This bill would require military service or civilian service for all men and women in furtherance of national defense and homeland security.... Rangel is concerned that under the current all-volunteer army, "the burden of military service is being borne disproportionately by members of disadvantaged groups." Representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) noted that administration officials and lawmakers would be less likely to go to war "if their own family members and neighbors faced the prospects of serving in the military on the front line." While Rangel himself is doubtful that his bill will pass, he does promise a vigorous debate on the issue. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. Armed Service Committe Chair, John McHugh, noted that there is not a lot of support for Rangel's bill either within the civilian community or perhaps more importantly within the military services themselves (January 7, 2003; Associated Press). There are government leaders who have argued for a draft quite apart from the current crisis. Articles in the New York Times and the Atlantic Monthly point to a widening gap between military personnel and civilians in our society. Some leaders believe that the change to an all-volunteer army has contributed to a generation of youth who no longer have a sense of duty or obligation to country. A draft, in their minds, would be a good way to correct this. The current mood in the country may provide this group of people with a window of opportunity to push this agenda. Given all these considerations, it is not possible to give a definitive answer about a potential draft. A universal draft would certainly extend the influence of the military within our society. As this debate develops, let the church nurture and extend our commitment to peace within our communities and world.
For updates on developments related to a potential draft, check the following websites:
http://www.sss.gov/statement.htm To see the text of bills related to a military draft, check the following website: http://thomas.loc.gov/
How would a draft work?If the President and Congress would authorize a draft, a lottery would be held to determine the order in which inductees would be called. Those turning 20 years old in the calendar year in which the draft is enacted would be the first to receive call-up notices. Those turning 21 would be called next, and on up through the age of 25 until sufficient numbers were inducted. Those turning 18 and 19 would only be called in the event of a very large personnel requirement. A return to military conscription could include an effort to draft women. Whether or not this effort would succeed, it is very important that both young men and young women prepare themselves for this eventuality. It is also important to note that current draft guidelines do not provide long-term exemptions for college students as was true of the Vietnam War draft. In a move to make the draft more equitable, college students who are drafted would only be permitted to complete the semester of study during which they received their notice. According to the guidelines, college seniors would be permitted to complete their senior year before reporting for duty. Those youth who are drafted would be given a physical and mental evaluation. After receiving the results of the evaluation, these youth would have ten days in which to submit a request for conscientious objector status. A limited number of other deferments would also be available. For more details, see the Selective Service website at: http://www.sss.gov/whhap.htm
There could also be a registry of medical personnel between the ages of 20-45, and a draft of
selected medical personnel. A plan for such a draft, known as the Health Care Personnel Delivery
System has been prepared by Selective Service but would not be passed into law unless there were
a national emergency. For more detailed information,
see the following websites:
http://www.nisbco.org/HCPDSWWW.htm
Are we ready?Mennonite Central Committee and denominational peace staff continue to monitor developments related to Selective Service and a draft. In addition, the Center on Conscience and War (formerly NISBCO; http://www.nisbco.org/) in Washington D.C. stands ready to assist. The Center on Conscience and War and MCC are also able to provide counseling for those already in the military who are seeking a discharge.
In the event of a draft, many church agencies would likely offer service opportunities which would qualify as alternate service under Selective Service guidelines. No doubt some of the current programs would qualify. Selective Service is not maintaining a list of qualified alternate service employers at this time, but will do so in the event of a draft. Selective Service is also prepared to match conscientious objectors with jobs that would qualify for alternate service. Individuals wishing to do alternate service could make their own arrangements with a qualified employer, or ask Selective Service to find an appropriate job and employer.
Military Registration DevelopmentsAs in the past, all 18-year-old males are required to register with Selective Service within 30 days of their 18th birthday. Failure to do so is punishable by fines (up to $250,000) and time in jail (up to 5 years). No one has been prosecuted for failure to register since the early 1980's. Instead, Selective Service has used other methods to ensure compliance with the registration law. Young men who do not register with Selective Service are ineligible for federal student aid and federal jobs. In addition, many states now also deny non-registrants financial aid for education. In the past year a new mechanism to increase registration compliance has been introduced into many states; the requirement to register with Selective Service when applying for or renewing a driver's license. As of May, 2002, 19 states, two territories and the District of Colombia had passed such legislation. Many conscientious objectors comply with the Selective Service registration requirement, although many who comply wish it were possible to register as conscientious objectors. For those whose conscience forbids them to cooperate with the Selective Service System in any way, there is help available to obtain education loans. The Mennonite Church USA has a fund which provides loans to assist non-registrants with higher education. Non-registrants wishing to apply for such an education loan or persons wishing to contribute to the fund should contact Kathy Harshbarger (PH: 574 294-7523, or < > Website: http://peace.MennoLink.org. A similar fund (FEAT: Fund for Education and Training) is held by the Center on Conscience & War in Washington D.C. They may be contacted at: 202 483-2220, or < > Website: http://www.centeronconscience.org
Suggested Actions
Susan Mark Landis |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||